Skip to main content

Mayes v. State

Citations

  • 8 S.W.3d 354
  • 1999 Tex. App. LEXIS 8584
  • 1999 WL 1036498

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that regardless of whether the officers uttered declaratory rather than interrogatory statements, the officers were pressing the defendant for information about the crime and their actions constituted interrogation
  • “We review de novo a trial court’s ruling on a motion to suppress if that ruling merely involved an application of law to undisputed fact.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Quinn and Reavis and Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.