D. Minnesota· 3/31/1995
Maxwell v. K Mart Corp.
Citations
- 880 F. Supp. 1323
- 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4311
- 1995 WL 140206
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “An implied de minimis exception protects the patentee whose compliance with the marking statute is nearly perfect”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Doty
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Transclean Corp. v. Bridgewood Services, Inc.D. Minnesota· 1999-11-12· cited 24×
- 3M Innovative Properties Co. v. Dupont Dow Elastomers LLCD. Minnesota· 2005-03-08· cited 21×
- Ethicon, Inc. v. United States Surgical Corp.D. Connecticut· 1996-09-09· cited 11×
- Heden v. HillS.D. Texas· 1996-08-13· cited 7×
- Sigma-Tau Industrie Farmaceutiche Riunite, S.P.A. v. Lonza, Ltd.District of Columbia· 1999-07-28· cited 3×
- Baxa Corp. v. McGaw, Inc.D. Colorado· 1998-01-23· cited 2×
- Tulip Computers International B v. v. Dell Computer Corp.D. Delaware· 2003-05-01· cited 2×
- Flatworld Interactives LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co.D. Delaware· 2014-12-31· cited 2×
- Lucent Technologies Inc. v. Gateway, Inc.S.D. California· 2007-01-12· cited 1×
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- City of New York v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court· 1953-01-12· cited 500×
- Avia Group International, Inc., (Formerly Pensa, Inc.) v. L.A. Gear California, Inc.Federal Circuit· 1988-07-29· cited 421×
- Richard C. Price v. Dale R. SymsekFederal Circuit· 1993-03-11· cited 284×
- Reliable Electric Co., Inc. v. Olson Construction CompanyTenth Circuit· 1984-02-28· cited 203×
- Union Carbide Corporation v. American Can CompanyFederal Circuit· 1984-01-04· cited 175×
- Orthokinetics, Inc. v. Safety Travel Chairs, Inc.Federal Circuit· 1986-12-05· cited 170×
- Amsted Industries Incorporated, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Buckeye Steel Castings CompanyFederal Circuit· 1994-05-24· cited 147×
- American Medical Systems, Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Medical Engineering CorporationFederal Circuit· 1993-12-06· cited 134×
- Dunlap v. SchofieldSupreme Court· 1894-03-05· cited 117×
- Kimberly-Clark Corporation v. The Procter & Gamble Distributing Co., Inc. And the Procter & Gamble Company, Defendants/cross-AppellantsFederal Circuit· 1992-08-26· cited 85×
- Innovative Scuba Concepts, Inc. v. Feder Industries, Inc., D/B/A Scuba ManufacturingFederal Circuit· 1994-06-15· cited 48×
- Broomall Industries, Inc. v. Data Design Logic Systems, Inc.Federal Circuit· 1986-03-17· cited 47×
- In Re Thomson McKinnon Securities Inc.S.D. New York· 1991-08-26· cited 30×
- Holmwood v. SugavanamFederal Circuit· 1991-11-05· cited 25×
- Hazeltine Corporation v. Radio CorporationS.D. New York· 1937-09-21· cited 21×
- Hedgewick v. AkersCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1974-06-13· cited 15×
- Jones v. Chemetron Corp. (In Re Allegheny International, Inc.)W.D. Pennsylvania· 1993-07-26· cited 7×
- Maxwell v. J. Baker, Inc.D. Minnesota· 1992-09-21· cited 5×
Other cases named Maxwell v. K Mart Corp.
4 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.