Union Carbide Corporation v. American Can Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• prior art references and the appellant’s invention were “easily under- standable without the need for expert explanatory testi- mony”
• “Here, the court looked at the readily understandable references, and we, like the trial court, discern no genuine issue on the question of what the references show. A trial on this issue would undoubtedly produce more argument but no more enlightenment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).