Kimberly-Clark Corporation v. The Procter & Gamble Distributing Co., Inc. And the Procter & Gamble Company, Defendants/cross-Appellants

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing “one inventor seeing a relevant report and building upon it” as an example of joint inventive effort
• “[T]here must be some element of joint behavior, such as collaboration or working under common direction, one inventor seeing a relevant report and building upon it or hearing another's suggestion at a meeting.”
• “For persons to be joint inventors under Section 116, there must be some element of joint behavior, such as collaboration or working under common direction, one inventor seeing a relevant report and building upon it or hearing another’s suggestion at a meeting.”
• “For persons to be joint inventors under Section 116, there must be some element of joint behavior, such as collaboration or working under common direction, one inventor seeing a relevant report and building upon it or hearing another’s suggestion at a meeting.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).