Maurizio v. Goldsmith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the mere dismissal of an ownership claim as time-barred does not mean that the court cannot consider the issue of ownership as part of plaintiffs Lanham Act claim
• recognizing state law may not be used to extend federal limitations period
• “[T]he question of whether the language was independently created by [plaintiff] is disputed, and thus one for the trier of fact.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Carell v. Shubert Organization, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 2000-06-27· cited 60×
• Polar International Brokerage Corp. v. Reeve
  S.D. New York· 2000-06-27· cited 41×
• Fiedler v. Incandela
  E.D. New York· 2016-12-06· cited 34×
• Auscape International v. National Geographic Society
  S.D. New York· 2004-08-12· cited 28×
• Gary Friedrich Enterprises, LLC v. Marvel Enterprises, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 2010-05-03· cited 28×
• Armstrong v. Virgin Records, Ltd.
  S.D. New York· 2000-04-03· cited 25×
• Scholastic, Inc. v. Stouffer
  S.D. New York· 2000-12-05· cited 22×
• Cerrato v. BAC Home Loans Servicing (In re Cerrato)
  E.D. New York· 2014-01-24· cited 17×
• the Kansas City Southern Railway Company v. Ronald K. Oney, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Daniel D. Oney
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2012-07-19· cited 13×
• Davis v. Blige
  S.D. New York· 2005-11-22· cited 4×
• McCord v. Jaspan Schlesinger Hoffman, LLP (In Re Monahan Ford Corp. of Flushing)
  E.D. New York· 2008-07-02· cited 3×
• Maxwood Music Ltd. v. Malakian
  S.D. New York· 2010-05-17· cited 3×
• Bartel v. Maersk Line, Ltd.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2023-04-20· cited 1×
• Bartel v. Farrell Lines
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2023-04-20· cited 1×

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
• Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of Catrett
  Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
• Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation
  Supreme Court· 1986-03-26· cited 58,760×
• Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.
  Supreme Court· 1991-03-27· cited 2,678×
• Carol A. Gallo v. Prudential Residential Services, Limited Partnership, Doing Business as Prudential Relocation Management
  Second Circuit· 1994-04-27· cited 2,455×
• Burnett v. New York Central Railroad
  Supreme Court· 1965-04-05· cited 1,036×
• Sheldon v. Metro-Goldwyn Pictures Corporation
  Second Circuit· 1936-01-17· cited 236×
• David Keller v. United States
  Seventh Circuit· 1995-06-29· cited 219×
• United States v. Bernard McKeon
  Second Circuit· 1984-06-20· cited 205×
• Purgess v. Sharrock
  Second Circuit· 1994-08-17· cited 181×
• Laureyssens v. Idea Group, Inc.
  Second Circuit· 1992-05-15· cited 164×
• Heidi S. Weissmann, M.D., Cross-Appellee v. Leonard M. Freeman, M.D., Cross-Appellant
  Second Circuit· 1989-02-23· cited 149×
• Karen L. Erickson v. Trinity Theatre, Inc., Individually and D/B/A Trinity Square Ensemble
  Seventh Circuit· 1994-01-06· cited 137×
• Greenberg v. Union Camp Corp.
  First Circuit· 1995-02-17· cited 107×
• Williams v. Crichton
  Second Circuit· 1996-05-22· cited 98×
• Stone v. Williams
  Second Circuit· 1992-07-13· cited 96×
• Alice Childress v. Clarice Taylor, Paul B. Berkowsky, the Moms Company, and Ben Caldwell
  Second Circuit· 1991-09-18· cited 92×
• VELASQUEZ
  Board of Immigration Appeals· 1986-07-01· cited 91×
• Lynn M. Thomson v. Allan S. Larson, Nanette Larson, and Julie Larson McCollum
  Second Circuit· 1998-06-19· cited 82×
• Matthew Bender & Company, Inc., Hyperlaw, Inc., Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellee v. West Publishing Co. And West Publishing Corporation
  Second Circuit· 1998-11-03· cited 78×