· 1/26/2000
Maurizio v. Goldsmith
Citations
- 84 F. Supp. 2d 455
- 53 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 788
- 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 788
- 2000 WL 97666
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the mere dismissal of an ownership claim as time-barred does not mean that the court cannot consider the issue of ownership as part of plaintiffs Lanham Act claim
- recognizing state law may not be used to extend federal limitations period
- “[T]he question of whether the language was independently created by [plaintiff] is disputed, and thus one for the trier of fact.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McKENNA
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.