Skip to main content
· 1/26/2000

Maurizio v. Goldsmith

Citations

  • 84 F. Supp. 2d 455
  • 53 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 788
  • 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 788
  • 2000 WL 97666

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the mere dismissal of an ownership claim as time-barred does not mean that the court cannot consider the issue of ownership as part of plaintiffs Lanham Act claim
  • recognizing state law may not be used to extend federal limitations period
  • “[T]he question of whether the language was independently created by [plaintiff] is disputed, and thus one for the trier of fact.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McKENNA

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.