Second Circuit· 7/13/1992

Stone v. Williams

Citations

970 F.2d 1043
23 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1492
1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 15847

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

observing that “[fraudulent concealment does not lessen a plaintiffs duty of diligence; it merely measures what a reasonably diligent plaintiff would or could have known regarding the claim”
noting that issue preclusion “prevent[s] relitigation of an issue of fact or law that has already been necessarily decided as part of a valid, final judgment”
\Each act of infringement is a distinct harm giving rise to an independent claim for relief.\
claim accrued at time that “a reasonably diligent person ... would have been put on inquiry as to existence of a right ...”
“Each act of infringement is a distinct harm giving rise to an independent claim for relief.”
“[O]ne may collaterally attack the subject matter or in personam jurisdiction of the court rendering a judgment put forth as preclusive.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

60 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

115 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.