Greenberg v. Union Camp Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that the prima facie burden is “relatively light”
• finding of no constructive discharge “buttressed by the fact that [the employee] couples his allegation of constructive discharge with virtually no evidence that [the employer’s] motives stemmed from an animosity towards age.”
• guoting Calhoun v. Acme Cleveland Corp., 798 F.2d 559, 561 (1st Cir. 1986) (further guotation omitted)
• rejecting constructive discharge claim where an employer required an employee to spend two additional days a week making sales calls
• affirming district court's denial of defendant's motion for a judgment as a matter of law
• noting no change in salary in course of finding no constructive dismissal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).