L. H. Morris Electric, Inc. v. Hyundai Semiconductor America, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that prejudgment interest is appropriate “even though damages are not ascertainable until issues of fact have been decided” (quotation marks omitted)
• party “never suggested that the trial court should have limited its consideration only to the pleadings”
• ‘When quantum meruit and contract claims are pleaded in the alternative, the quantum meruit claim becomes relevant only if the contract does not address the services for which recovery in quantum meruit is sought.”
• so holding under similar circumstances

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).