Pamplin v. Victoria

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• considering, at first level of analysis, United States Supreme Court cases interpreting federal rule on which Oregon based its rule
• pre-existing federal court decisions construing federal rule of civil procedure relevant to interpretation of identical Oregon rule based on the federal counterpart
• emphasizing “the need for flexibility and discretion on the part of the trial judge”
• finding of willfulness, bad faith, or fault of similar degree on part of disobedient party is required for trial court to impose sanction of dismissal for failing to obey discovery order under ORCP 46(B)(2)(c)
• finding of willfulness, bad faith, or fault of similar degree on part of disobedient party is required for trial court to impose sanction of dismissal for failing to obey discovery order under ORCP 46(B)(2)(c)
• “ORCP 46 B(2)(c) is a statute, to which we apply the usual method of statutory interpretation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Peeples v. Lampert
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2008-08-14· cited 389×
• McCarthy v. Oregon Freeze Dry, Inc.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1998-06-11· cited 121×
• Stevens v. Czerniak
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2004-02-05· cited 82×
• State v. Klein
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2012-08-02· cited 80×
• McCarthy v. Oregon Freeze Dry, Inc.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1998-04-23· cited 77×
• A. G. v. Guitron
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2011-12-30· cited 31×
• Association of Unit Owners of Timbercrest Condominiums v. Warren
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2012-10-18· cited 25×
• Jaimez v. Rosales
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-01-25· cited 20×
• Lambert v. American Dream Homes Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-06-11· cited 14×
• Lang v. Rogue Valley Medical Center/Asante
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2017-06-02· cited 14×
• Chang v. Chun
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-07-01· cited 13×
• Pamplin v. Victoria
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-01-24· cited 12×
• Shea v. Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-11-24· cited 11×
• SAIF Corp. v. Harris
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-06-02· cited 9×
• Cedartech, Inc. v. Strader
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-08-08· cited 9×
• Budden v. Dykstra
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-05-29· cited 8×
• Frost v. Lotspeich
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-07-05· cited 8×
• State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. G. A. K.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-01-28· cited 6×
• STATE, DEPT. OF HUMAN RESOURCES v. Trost
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-05-26· cited 5×
• Peeples v. Lampert
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-11-01· cited 5×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & Industries
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-10-19· cited 2,400×
• National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1976-10-04· cited 2,202×
• Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. Rogers
  Supreme Court· 1958-06-16· cited 1,195×
• Mattiza v. Foster
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1990-12-20· cited 147×
• State v. Stockfleth
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1991-01-03· cited 20×
• State Ex Rel. Nilsen v. Berry
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1967-12-06· cited 6×
• Pamplin v. Victoria
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-09-29· cited 2×

Other cases named Pamplin v. Victoria

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Pamplin v. Victoria
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-01-24· cited 12×
• Pamplin v. Victoria
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-09-29· cited 2×