Robert A. Johnson, Jr. v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that testimony at issue constituted multilevel hearsay, but finding no prejudice because improper testimony was cumulative of other evidence
• concluding tainted testimony likely did not influence the jury’s conclusion because the remaining evidence against the defendant was “substantial”
• determining permissible parameters of time for CSLI searches is difficult and requires fact-intensive inquiry
• no substantial likelihood of miscarriage of justice where erroneously admitted evidence did not likely influence jury's conclusion
• no substantial likelihood of miscarriage of justice where testimony at issue was cumulative of other evidence and did not likely influence jury's conclusion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).