Parker v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Intent to commit a battery may be determined from a consideration of the conduct and the natural and usual sequence to which such conduct logically and reasonably points.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Washington v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1982-11-30· cited 42×
• Matthews v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1985-04-26· cited 24×
• Wells v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1990-07-09· cited 10×
• Blinn v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1986-01-13· cited 3×

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hollon v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1980-01-23· cited 67×
• Woods v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1954-05-20· cited 63×
• Carter v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1980-11-25· cited 26×
• McCawley v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1980-09-10· cited 25×
• Hensley v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1971-04-05· cited 21×
• Guffey v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1979-03-06· cited 20×
• Clark v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1853-05-30· cited 19×
• McIntosh v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1970-07-31· cited 15×
• Otto v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1980-01-14· cited 14×
• Decker v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1979-03-05· cited 14×
• Padgett v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1978-09-11· cited 13×
• Lewis v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1980-09-25· cited 10×
• Hart v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1978-05-09· cited 9×
• Burnett v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1981-04-14· cited 5×
• White v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1981-03-19· cited 4×
• Colburn v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1978-12-14· cited 3×