Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 9/24/1982
Matter of Terwilliger
Citations
- 450 A.2d 1376
- 304 Pa. Super. 553
- 1982 Pa. Super. LEXIS 5318
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that the state “has the right and the duty to act to protect its weaker members”
- noting the existence of a fundamental right under Skinner and requiring court approval for sterilization of either a male or a female adult ward
- \[P]rior judicial approval is required before a guardian may consent to administering or withholding of proposed extraordinary medical treatment.\
- “[Pjrior judicial approval is required before a guardian may consent to administering or withholding of proposed extraordinary medical treatment.”
- “[T]he Commonwealth, acting in its role as parens patriae, has the right and the duty to act to protect its weaker members.... This doctrine of inherent parens patriae jurisdiction over decisions involving irrevocable individual.”
- tubal ligation of mentally incompetent
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Beck, Montemuro, Popovich
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Unnamed caseThird Circuit· 2000-11-07· cited 563×
- Conservatorship of Valerie N.California Supreme Court· 1985-10-21· cited 40×
- In the Matter of the Guardianship and Conservatorship of Stuart Kennedy (Involuntary) Stuart Kennedy v. Maria KennedySupreme Court of Iowa· 2014-04-18· cited 37×
- P.S. ex rel. Harbin v. W.S.Indiana Supreme Court· 1983-09-02· cited 26×
- Matter of Guardianship of MatejskiSupreme Court of Iowa· 1988-02-17· cited 17×
- In re D.L.H.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2010-08-17· cited 17×
- In re Estate of K.E.J.Appellate Court of Illinois· 2008-04-18· cited 16×
- Vaughn v. RuoffEighth Circuit· 2001-06-22· cited 15×
- In Re FioriSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-01-17· cited 15×
- DOES I THROUGH III v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2011-09-30· cited 12×
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists v. ThornburghE.D. Pennsylvania· 1987-03-09· cited 11×
- Nonnenman v. ElshimySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-11-09· cited 11×
- Estate of C.W.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-03-28· cited 8×
- Matter of RomeroSupreme Court of Colorado· 1990-04-23· cited 5×
- Kayla Doherty v. Merck & Co., Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2017-01-26· cited 4×
- In re I.L.P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-01-21· cited 4×
- In Re EaslyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-02-26· cited 3×
- Margaret Vaughn v. Sutton RuoffEighth Circuit· 2001-06-22· cited 3×
- In re D.L.H.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-02-10· cited 3×
- In Re WirsingMichigan Court of Appeals· 1995-10-24· cited 2×
Cites
38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court· 1978-06-05· cited 5,547×
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court· 1967-05-15· cited 5,473×
- Addington v. TexasSupreme Court· 1979-04-30· cited 3,004×
- Skinner v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. WilliamsonSupreme Court· 1942-06-01· cited 1,929×
- Haynes v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1963-05-27· cited 1,403×
- In Re QuinlanSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1976-03-31· cited 379×
- Superintendent of Belchertown State School v. SaikewiczMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1977-11-28· cited 327×
- In Re William L.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-01-31· cited 319×
- In Re Custody of HernandezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-06-29· cited 198×
- Guardianship of RoeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1981-04-23· cited 118×
- In Re GradySupreme Court of New Jersey· 1981-02-18· cited 111×
- In the Matter of SpringMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1980-05-13· cited 100×
- Petition of EdilsonSupreme Court of Colorado· 1981-11-30· cited 92×
- In the Matter of MoeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1982-03-16· cited 79×
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1967-09-15· cited 63×
- In Re the Guardianship of HayesWashington Supreme Court· 1980-03-27· cited 59×
- Strunk Ex Rel. Burton v. StrunkCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1969-09-26· cited 58×
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Snively v. SnivelySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1965-09-16· cited 45×
- In the Interest of M. K. R.Supreme Court of Missouri· 1974-11-12· cited 38×
- Wade v. Bethesda HospitalS.D. Ohio· 1971-09-08· cited 37×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.