Skip to main content
· 11/9/1992

Nonnenman v. Elshimy

Citations

  • 615 A.2d 799
  • 419 Pa. Super. 597
  • 1992 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3817

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “[t]he ultimate consideration for the court is a determination of what is in the best interest of the child, and all other considerations are deemed subordinate to the child’s physical, intellectual, moral, and spiritual well- being.”
  • rights of guardian of incompetent adult existed solely for ward’s benefit and were subordinate to best interest of ward’s child with respect to child’s visitation with ward
  • “in matters of custody and visitation, the ultimate consideration for the court is a determination of what is in the best interest of the child, and all other considerations are deemed subordinate to the child’s physical, intellectual, moral, and spiritual well-being”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Olszewski, Elliott, Hester

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.