P.S. ex rel. Harbin v. W.S.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that in order to prove “causal connection” between specific traumatic event and injury, plaintiff must show that injury was “ ‘the direct result of a specific traumatic incident’ ” (quoting N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-2(6) (2005)
• \The statute defines an `injury by accident' ... to be an injury that is `the direct result of a specific traumatic incident' and `causally related to such incident.'\
• “The statute defines an ‘injury by accident’... to be an injury that is ‘the direct result of a specific traumatic incident’ and ‘causally related to such incident.’ ” (quoting N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-2(6)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).