New Mexico Court of Appeals· 3/6/1990

State v. Bartlett

Citations

789 P.2d 627
109 N.M. 679

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that where less drastic remedies are available, “a claim of violation of due process is less persuasive”
holding that the defendant suffered no prejudice from the loss of evidence because the defendant could use the police reports and cross-examinations of the investigating officer and the victim to establish the inconsistency between the victim’s description of the perpetrator
stating that “the defendant must establish prejudice resulting from the violation”
focusing on the importance of the missing evidence to the defendant’s case because the jury failed to reach a verdict and therefore the strength of the other evidence was not evident
focusing on the importance of the missing evidence to the defendant’s case because the jury failed to reach a verdict and therefore the strength of the other evidence was not evident
focusing on the importance of the missing evidence to the defendant’s case because the jury failed to reach a verdict and therefore the strength of the <?ther evidence was not evident

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alarid, Bivins, Apodaca

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.