Matek v. Murat

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that judicial estoppel would be applied where refraining to do so would be inequitable and inefficient and would allow plaintiffs to disavow representations made to both the court and the defendants

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Patriot Cinemas, Inc. v. General Cinema Corp.
  First Circuit· 1987-11-24· cited 247×
• United States v. Raymond Luc Levasseur, A/K/A John, Jack, Jake and George, United States v. Raymond Luc Levasseur, Etc.
  First Circuit· 1988-05-09· cited 83×
• United States v. Levasseur
  D. Massachusetts· 1988-03-18· cited 27×
• Deutsch Energy Co. v. Sherman Mazur Richard Wall Jerome Weiner New Century Energy Corp. New Century Oil & Gas Supply Corp. Jack Ralston
  Ninth Circuit· 1987-04-08· cited 21×
• Michael v. Boutwell
  N.D. Mississippi· 2015-10-07· cited 4×
• Unnamed case
  Eighth Circuit· 1987-02-23· cited 3×
• Sarro v. City of Sacramento
  E.D. California· 1999-12-22· cited 1×
• Unnamed case
  First Circuit· 1987-11-12
• Unnamed case
  Ninth Circuit· 1988-11-25
• Saes Getters S.p.A. v. Ergenics, Inc.
  D. New Jersey· 1992-06-15

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs
  Supreme Court· 1966-03-28· cited 13,852×
• John D. Williamson, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross v. Gordon G. Tucker, Defendants-Appellees-Cross
  Fifth Circuit· 1981-05-20· cited 1,640×
• United Housing Foundation, Inc. v. Forman
  Supreme Court· 1975-10-06· cited 908×
• Landreth Timber Co. v. Landreth
  Supreme Court· 1985-05-28· cited 514×
• Scarano v. Central R. Co. Of New Jersey
  Third Circuit· 1953-04-14· cited 484×
• Cianci v. Superior Court
  California Supreme Court· 1985-12-31· cited 135×
• Securities Investor Protection Corp. v. Vigman
  Ninth Circuit· 1985-07-02· cited 122×
• J. Donald GOODWIN, Appellant, v. ELKINS & CO., Robert G. Hayden, Richard Sichenzio, and Gabriel F. Nagy, Appellees
  Third Circuit· 1984-03-14· cited 117×
• Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,011 Howard C. Hirsch v. Edmond Du Pont, and Haskins & Sells and New York Stock Exchange, Inc.
  Second Circuit· 1977-04-07· cited 112×
• Ernest v. Miller
  Supreme Court· 1975-10-14· cited 72×
• Hirsch v. DuPont
  S.D. New York· 1975-06-09· cited 46×
• New York Stock Exchange, Inc. v. Sloan
  S.D. New York· 1975-05-02· cited 31×
• A. B. PARVIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DAVIS OIL COMPANY Et Al., Defendants-Appellees
  Ninth Circuit· 1975-10-20· cited 27×
• Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 91,421 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Professional Associates and Robert C. Labine
  Sixth Circuit· 1984-04-10· cited 26×
• Selected Risks Insurance v. Kobelinski
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1976-10-12· cited 23×
• Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,502 Howard H. Mason v. Bradley Unkeless
  Ninth Circuit· 1980-05-12· cited 15×
• Wade v. Woodings-Verona Tool Works, Inc.
  W.D. Pennsylvania· 1979-03-19· cited 14×
• Slevin v. Pedersen Associates, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 1982-05-20· cited 13×
• Determined Productions, Inc. v. R. Dakin & Co.
  N.D. California· 1979-11-26· cited 13×
• Sandusky Land, Ltd. v. Uniplan Groups, Inc.
  N.D. Ohio· 1975-09-05· cited 10×