Selected Risks Insurance v. Kobelinski

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant was judicially estopped from asserting subject matter jurisdiction because it had previously won a dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction
• holding that the defendant was judicially estopped from asserting the existence of subject matter jurisdiction where in a former action, it argued “that the Court lacked jurisdiction”
• “Cases . . . have held that subject matter jurisdiction exists in the district courts pursuant to [§ 634(b)(1
• judicial estoppel is the well[-]established principle that a party may not assert contrary positions in the same or related proceedings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Wight v. BankAmerica Corp.
  Second Circuit· 2000-05-25· cited 274×
• Brendan Gilmore v. Shearson/american Express Inc.
  Second Circuit· 1987-02-03· cited 72×
• Finley v. Kesling
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1982-03-18· cited 56×
• Herbert Sperling v. United States
  Second Circuit· 1982-12-20· cited 43×
• Ligon v. Middletown Area School District
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-12-11· cited 40×
• David v. Showtime/The Movie Channel, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 1988-10-18· cited 31×
• Wight v. Bankamerica Corporation
  Second Circuit· 2000-05-25· cited 14×
• Matek v. Murat
  C.D. California· 1986-06-19· cited 14×
• Wade v. Woodings-Verona Tool Works, Inc.
  W.D. Pennsylvania· 1979-03-19· cited 14×
• Zemprelli v. Thornburgh
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-12-16· cited 13×
• Lawrence v. United States of America Interstate Commerce Commission
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1986-03-07· cited 8×
• Barber v. Fairbanks Capital Corp. (In Re Barber)
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2001-08-24· cited 6×
• Eierman v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1984-01-04· cited 4×
• Barela v. Barela
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1980-11-06· cited 3×
• United Penn Bank v. U.S.A. Small Business Administration
  M.D. Pennsylvania· 1984-09-21· cited 2×
• Bayco, Inc. v. Weaver
  D. Puerto Rico· 1981-05-15· cited 1×
• Robinson v. US, Through Small Business Admin.
  M.D. Louisiana· 1982-12-09
• S.R. Basinger v. R. Adamson ~ Appeal of: R. Adamson
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2023-06-02

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Preiser v. Rodriguez
  Supreme Court· 1973-05-07· cited 9,100×
• Scarano v. Central R. Co. Of New Jersey
  Third Circuit· 1953-04-14· cited 484×
• Bulova Watch Co. v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1961-04-17· cited 224×
• Grubbs v. General Electric Credit Corp.
  Supreme Court· 1973-10-09· cited 121×
• Ernest v. Miller
  Supreme Court· 1975-10-14· cited 72×
• Leong T. Mar and Thick Gon Mar v. Thomas Kleppe, Administrator of the Small Business Administration
  Tenth Circuit· 1975-07-16· cited 57×
• John E. Romeo and Beverly C. Romeo v. United States of America
  Fifth Circuit· 1972-07-07· cited 42×
• Jett v. Zink
  Fifth Circuit· 1973-02-09· cited 25×
• Iselin v. La Coste
  Fifth Circuit· 1945-02-12· cited 24×
• Simpkins v. Davidson
  S.D. New York· 1969-04-24· cited 21×
• Buehler v. Philadelphia & Reading Ry. Co.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1924-03-17· cited 18×
• Ralphs Grocery Co., Etc. v. Meat Cutters Union Loc. No. 421
  C.D. California· 1973-07-18· cited 7×