Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 91,421 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Professional Associates and Robert C. Labine

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We conclude that the district court did not err in allowing the oral testimony as to the actual operation of the trusts to show that there was a common enterprise [the second of the three elements of a ‘security’ under these Acts].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).