Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 5/28/1985

Landreth Timber Co. v. Landreth

Citations

  • 471 U.S. 681
  • 105 S. Ct. 2297
  • 85 L. Ed. 2d 692
  • 1985 U.S. LEXIS 20
  • 53 U.S.L.W. 4602

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that an instrument constitutes stock'when it “is both called ‘stock’ and bears stock’s usual characteristics”
  • finding that calling instruments “stock” justifiably leads purchasers to believe that the federal securities laws apply
  • finding that calling instruments \stock\ justifiably leads purchasers to believe that the federal securities laws apply
  • indicating that Howey’s control test determines whether an instrument constitutes an investment contract
  • observing that Marine Bank considered whether “a privately negotiated profit[-]sharing agreement” is a security
  • relying on public expectations in holding that common stock is always a security

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Powell, Burger, Brennan, White, Marshall, Blackmun, Rehnquist, O'Con-Nor, Stevens

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

388 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Landreth Timber Co. v. Landreth

5 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.