Skip to main content
· 10/10/2000

Mastandrea v. North

Citations

  • 760 A.2d 677
  • 361 Md. 107
  • 2000 Md. LEXIS 667

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the Board did not have to consider whether denying the variance would have denied reasonable and significant use of the entire lot, but rather whether denying the variance would have denied reasonable and significant use of the buffer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harrell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.