Skip to main content
· 8/22/1991

Arundel Corp. v. County Commissioners

Citations

  • 594 A.2d 95
  • 323 Md. 504
  • 1991 Md. LEXIS 137

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an application for a building permit does not create vested rights
  • stating that application for permit does not create vested right
  • construing amendments to zoning ordinance which changed the filing requirements for conditional use applications to operate only prospectively
  • construing amendments to zoning ordinance which changed the filing requirements for conditional use applications to operate only prospectively
  • where applications for conditional uses were filed prior to an amendment changing the nature of the documentation required to support the applications, held that under the general rule in Riverdale Fire Company, 308 Md. 556, 520 A.2d 1319 (1987

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rodowsky, Murphy, McAuliffe, Chasanow, Charles, Orth, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.