White v. North

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the determination of unwarranted hardship was the determinative factor in granting a variance and all other factors constituted guidance and could not be construed individually
• reviewing for substantial evidence the decision of the Board of Appeals of Anne Arundel County, which reversed the decision of the hearing officer
• “We have recently held, in White, that these criteria must be applied in total and generally, and that no individual factor is to be determinative”
• “As long as evidence exists before the agency that would make its factual determination as to reasonableness and significance fairly debatable, its determination ordinarily should be upheld.”
• “As long as evidence exists before the agency that would 44 make its factual determination as to reasonableness and significance fairly debatable, its determination ordinarily should be upheld.”
• “As long as evidence exists before the agency that would 44 make its factual determination as to reasonableness and significance fairly debatable, its determination ordinarily should be upheld.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).