Skip to main content

MARTIN v. THE STATE (Two Cases)

Citations

  • 852 S.E.2d 834
  • 310 Ga. 658

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that it was not unforeseeable that “someone might get shot during the commission of such an obviously dangerous and illegal enterprise”
  • holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying a motion for mistrial where, among other things, the trial court promptly gave a curative instruction and asked the jurors if they understood the instruction and the jurors responded that they did
  • rejecting the defendant’s speculative argument that the jury was misled by the charge, and so finding that the defendant had not demonstrated plain error
  • photograph of victim holding his son was not overly prejudicial, as the son was also a victim in this case, and the jury was “well aware” of the son and “aspects of their relationship”
  • “all of the participants in a conspiracy are criminally responsible for the acts of each, committed in the execution of the conspiracy, and which may be said to be a probable consequence of the conspiracy, even though the particular act may not actually have been part of the plan”
  • malice murder case; foreseeability of death during armed robbery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.