Skip to main content

Crawford v. State

Citations

  • 294 Ga. 898
  • 757 S.E.2d 102
  • 2014 Fulton County D. Rep. 736
  • 2014 WL 1266203
  • 2014 Ga. LEXIS 248

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that accomplice’s testimony and phone records were sufficient as a matter of federal due process to sustain the appel- lant’s convictions
  • holding that cell phone records — the only independent evidence specifically implicating the defendant — were sufficient circumstantial evidence to authorize the jury to determine that the accomplice’s testimony was corroborated
  • holding that the phone 11 records which revealed the location of the phone during the commission of the offenses “provided only circumstantial evidence of Crawford’s participation in the crimes,” but was sufficient to corroborate the accomplice’s testimony
  • phone records reflecting four calls between the parties to a murder on the day of the crime sufficiently corroborated accomplice’s testimony
  • to corroborate an accomplice’s testimony, State must adduce “some independent evidence tending to show that the defendant himself was a participant in the crimes”
  • phone records that provide circumstantial evidence of the crimes sufficient to corroborate accomplice testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hunstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.