Warren v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that 911 call to describe events that occurred over one hour before call was admissible under excited utterance exception to hearsay rule
• stating that, “[d]uring closing arguments, a prosecutor may not misrepresent the legal effect of the defendant’s statements and may not express personal opinions about the credibility of witnesses.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Baker v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2006-08-28· cited 95×
• Hunter v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2002-12-30· cited 63×
• Zebroski v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2010-03-09· cited 52×
• Taylor v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2013-09-25· cited 31×
• Hall v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2001-12-26· cited 28×
• Hallums v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2004-02-12· cited 23×
• Spence v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2015-11-13· cited 22×
• Martin v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2013-02-04· cited 22×
• Green v. St. Francis Hospital, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2002-02-19· cited 15×
• Bruce v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2001-09-13· cited 14×
• Norcross v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2011-12-21· cited 10×
• Wheeler v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2012-02-07· cited 9×
• Dixon v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2010-05-20· cited 8×
• Price v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2004-09-08· cited 8×
• McKinley v. Casson
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2013-10-31· cited 7×
• Jeter v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2007-10-29· cited 2×
• Pressey v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2011-08-02· cited 2×
• State v. Clark
  Superior Court of Delaware· 2017-02-13
• State v. Tunnell
  Superior Court of Delaware· 2020-08-18
• Trala v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2020-12-22