Skip to main content

Martin v. State

Citations

  • 314 N.E.2d 60
  • 262 Ind. 232
  • 1974 Ind. LEXIS 290

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • trial court did not err by refusing to give a jury instruction defining the term “purposely” because “the word ‘purposely’ is not used in a technical legal sense and is quite readily understood by the average layman”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Debruler, Arterburn, Givan, Hunter, Prentice

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

61 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.