Skip to main content

Martin v. State

Citations

  • 987 So. 2d 1240
  • 2008 WL 3349065

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that where the officer continued with the interrogation after the defendant had repeatedly asserted that he had “nothing to say,” the continued interrogation violated the defendant‟s right to remain silent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Silberman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.