Skip to main content

Smith v. State

Citations

  • 915 So. 2d 692
  • 2005 WL 3053900

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the defendant said to the detective \that he had `nothing to say' to her\ and concluding that the expression was \more than sufficient\ to invoke the defendant's right to remain silent
  • finding defendant’s statement during interrogation that he had “nothing to say” was an unequivocal invocation of his right to remain silent
  • suspect’s statement in no uncertain terms that he had “nothing to say” to law enforcement when asked if he wanted to waive his rights and give his side of the story was unambiguous
  • dismissing State's contention that defendant's assertion was ambiguous
  • dismissing State's contention that defendant's assertion was ambiguous

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gersten and Green, JJ. and Schwartz, Senior Judge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.