District Court of Appeal of Florida· 11/16/2005
Smith v. State
Citations
- 915 So. 2d 692
- 2005 WL 3053900
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the defendant said to the detective \that he had `nothing to say' to her\ and concluding that the expression was \more than sufficient\ to invoke the defendant's right to remain silent
- finding defendant’s statement during interrogation that he had “nothing to say” was an unequivocal invocation of his right to remain silent
- suspect’s statement in no uncertain terms that he had “nothing to say” to law enforcement when asked if he wanted to waive his rights and give his side of the story was unambiguous
- dismissing State's contention that defendant's assertion was ambiguous
- dismissing State's contention that defendant's assertion was ambiguous
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gersten and Green, JJ. and Schwartz, Senior Judge
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Cuervo v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2007-07-12· cited 88×
- Alvarez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-07-15· cited 16×
- Scott v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-12-22· cited 5×
- Martin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-08-13· cited 2×
- Cuervo v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-05-12· cited 1×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1994-06-24· cited 2,777×
- Michigan v. MosleySupreme Court· 1975-12-09· cited 2,561×
- Gerald Anthony Coleman v. Harry K. Singletary, Robert A. ButterworthEleventh Circuit· 1994-09-08· cited 119×
- Grady Arnold v. D.L. RunnelsNinth Circuit· 2005-08-24· cited 68×
- Crossley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1992-03-19· cited 61×
- Owen v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2003-10-23· cited 53×
- United States v. William Bushyhead, Sr.Ninth Circuit· 2001-10-30· cited 49×
- State v. DaySupreme Court of Minnesota· 2000-12-14· cited 13×
- People v. DouglasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2004-06-14· cited 13×
- Ford v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-12-19· cited 12×
- United States v. ReidD. Massachusetts· 2002-07-17· cited 12×
- State v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2002-04-02· cited 7×
- United States v. StewartD. Kansas· 1999-01-28· cited 4×
- United States v. StewartD. Kansas· 1999-05-07· cited 4×
- Sotolongo v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-05-09· cited 2×
- Dunn v. Gap Pond Freewill Baptist Church & Community Cemetery, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-11-15· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.