Martin v. Block Communications, Inc.
Citations
- 2017 Ohio 1474
Syllabus
Trial court did not err in: finding that appellant did not have a right to amend his complaint because he failed to file an amended complaint within the time allowed under Civ.R. 15(A) denying appellant's motion for leave to amend because the proposed amended complaint did not cure the pleading deficiencies or considering appellees' Civ.R. 12(B)(6) motion to dismiss the original complaint because it was the only pleading before the trial court. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Mayle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.