Skip to main content
· 5/29/2015

Martin Schell v. Bluebird Media

Citations

  • 787 F.3d 1179
  • 91 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1484
  • 40 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 273
  • 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 8912
  • 2015 WL 3429443

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • emphasizing that “information and belief is insufficient” (citation omitted)
  • applying the same pre-2009 protected activity test

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith, Benton, Shepherd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.