Skip to main content
· 9/16/1997

Stanley D. Rabushka, Ex Rel. United States of America Stanley D. Rabushka v. Crane Company

Citations

  • 122 F.3d 559

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding because a recusal motion was not filed until after the district court had granted summary judgment to the opposing party on the merits of the case, the motion was untimely
  • stating the grounds for summary judgment on a claim under the FCA
  • “[Plaintiff] merely offered his general theory that a fraud occurred and asserted that any communications made aided that fraud, a showing that does not satisfy the requirements of the crime-fraud exception or justify in camera review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wollman, Magill, Beam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.