Rotskoff v. Cooley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that argument was waived “because the issue was not developed in ... briefs as required by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 28(a)(9)(A)”
• holding that party waived an issue because it was not developed in his briefs
• holding a failure to develop an issue in the briefs is equivalent to an abandonment of the issue for failure to provide a reason for a contention
• observing that an issue is deemed abandoned when it is not developed in brief
• noting the court may consider an argument abandoned if a party fails to provide arguments for its contentions
• finding waiver where party failed to develop argument in his briefs pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 28(a)(9)(A)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).