Skip to main content
· 10/9/2009

USCOC of Greater Missouri v. City of Ferguson, MO.

Citations

  • 583 F.3d 1035
  • 48 Communications Reg. (P&F) 1015
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 22234
  • 2009 WL 3233411

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the central concern of the “in writing” requirement is to enable effective judicial review of local government action
  • no jurisdiction to decide issues on appeal that were not designated, and therefore not preserved, in NOA
  • no jurisdiction to decide issues on appeal that were not designated, and therefore preserved, in NOA
  • discussing application of Rule 3(c)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, Gibson, Riley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.