· 10/9/2009
USCOC of Greater Missouri v. City of Ferguson, MO.
Citations
- 583 F.3d 1035
- 48 Communications Reg. (P&F) 1015
- 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 22234
- 2009 WL 3233411
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the central concern of the “in writing” requirement is to enable effective judicial review of local government action
- no jurisdiction to decide issues on appeal that were not designated, and therefore not preserved, in NOA
- no jurisdiction to decide issues on appeal that were not designated, and therefore preserved, in NOA
- discussing application of Rule 3(c)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Murphy, Gibson, Riley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.