Marshall v. R & M ERECTORS, INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the argument that no back wages were owed because the sum of forty hours compensated at the minimum wage and twenty hours of overtime based on the minimum wage would have been less than the salaries actually paid

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).