State ex rel. Stevenson v. Ghawi

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Village of Clarendon Hill’s pooled self-insurance “is not and ought not to be treated as a private insurance carrier,” and thus had no obligation to contribute to a claim paid by Aetna
• holding the trial court properly granted summary judgment to IRMA as the evidence before the court showed that IRMA’s right to judgment was clear; as a matter of law IRMA was not an insurance company, but a pool of self-insured municipalities
• holding the trial court properly granted summary judgment to IRMA as the evidence before the court showed that IRMA’s right to judgment was clear; as a matter of 16 1-10-0100 law IRMA was not an insurance company, but a pool of self-insured municipalities
• noting a \public policy interest of protecting public funds and property and preventing the diversion of tax monies from their intended purpose of paying damage claims\
• noting a “public policy interest of protecting public funds and property and preventing the diversion of tax monies from their intended purpose of paying damage claims”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).