Skip to main content
· 3/23/1989

McLaughlin v. DialAmerica Marketing, Inc.

Citations

  • 716 F. Supp. 812
  • 29 Wage & Hour Cas. (BNA) 645
  • 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2985
  • 1989 WL 76046

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • opining that the “sheer commonality of [employees’ } testimony breathes credibility into the claims”
  • injunctions are issued because of public interest and to relieve Secretary of the burden of enforcement
  • “It is enough under these circumstances if there is a basis for a reasonable inference as to the extent of damages”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wolin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.