Skip to main content
· 8/18/1987

Marriage of Eckman v. Eckman

Citations

  • 410 N.W.2d 385
  • 1987 Minn. App. LEXIS 4682

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the district court’s failure to make a specific finding was not reversible error when it was implicit in other findings
  • upholding modification where explicit findings on advantage of change not made
  • rejecting argument that reversal is required when district court failed to “make a specific finding regarding” a statutory element because court’s consideration of that element was “implicit” in its findings regarding other elements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Heard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.