Marriage of Rinker v. Rinker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing because the district court failed to make findings indicating that it “consider[ed] and evaluate[d] the ‘interaction and interrelationship’ of the child with his siblings”
• “While split custody decisions may be made within the discretion of the [district] court, they are viewed as unfortunate and are carefully scrutinized.” (quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).