Supreme Court of Minnesota· 6/3/1983
Auge v. Auge
Citations
- 334 N.W.2d 393
- 1983 Minn. LEXIS 1204
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noncustodial parent has burden of proof of showing that removal is not in best interests of the child
- removal from state may be permitted without a hearing, and trial court has obligation in these situations to make appropriate modifications of visitation
- “[i]n the past, removal was commonly denied because of the potential loss of jurisdiction over custody issues”
- party opposing motion to remove must establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the move is not in the best interests of the child
- relocation should not be disallowed solely to maintain the existing visitation patterns
- removal should not be disallowed solely to maintain the existing visitation patterns
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Amdahl
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
104 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In re the Marriage of LittlefieldWashington Supreme Court· 1997-08-07· cited 684×
- In Re Marriage of LittlefieldWashington Supreme Court· 1997-08-07· cited 670×
- Marriage of Sefkow v. SefkowSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1988-07-15· cited 211×
- Taylor v. TaylorTennessee Supreme Court· 1993-02-22· cited 157×
- Bates v. TesarTex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2002-06-06· cited 150×
- Gruber v. GruberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-12-03· cited 139×
- Stout v. StoutNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1997-04-01· cited 120×
- Ireland v. IrelandSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-08-18· cited 120×
- Cooper v. CooperSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1984-11-14· cited 110×
- Hollandsworth v. KnyzewskiSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2003-06-05· cited 101×
- Baures v. LewisSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2001-04-23· cited 100×
- Hoover (Letourneau) v. HooverSupreme Court of Vermont· 2000-10-20· cited 94×
- Jaime Taormina Bisbing v. Glenn R. Bisbing, III (077533) (Sussex County and Statewide)Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2017-08-08· cited 91×
- Marriage of Goldman v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2008-03-27· cited 86×
- Mize v. MizeSupreme Court of Florida· 1993-07-01· cited 82×
- Yannas v. Frondistou-YannasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1985-08-20· cited 82×
- Jaramillo v. JaramilloNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1991-12-24· cited 73×
- In Re the Welfare of J.J.B.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1986-07-11· cited 61×
- Lane v. SchenckSupreme Court of Vermont· 1992-05-22· cited 53×
- In Re Marriage of CondonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1998-03-23· cited 48×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- D'Onofrio v. D'OnofrioNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1976-09-01· cited 180×
- Marriage of Nice-Petersen v. Nice-PetersenSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1981-09-25· cited 98×
- Peterson v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1976-05-07· cited 41×
- Hale v. HaleMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1981-12-22· cited 38×
- In Re the Marriage of LowerSupreme Court of Iowa· 1978-09-20· cited 28×
- Matter of EhlenSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1981-04-01· cited 25×
- Jafari v. JafariNebraska Supreme Court· 1979-10-23· cited 25×
- Hutchins v. HutchinsMichigan Court of Appeals· 1978-06-19· cited 21×
- Marriage of Hummel v. HummelSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1981-03-27· cited 13×
- In Re Marriage of SiklossyAppellate Court of Illinois· 1980-07-28· cited 7×
Other cases named Auge v. Auge
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.