Skip to main content

Auge v. Auge

Citations

  • 334 N.W.2d 393
  • 1983 Minn. LEXIS 1204

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noncustodial parent has burden of proof of showing that removal is not in best interests of the child
  • removal from state may be permitted without a hearing, and trial court has obligation in these situations to make appropriate modifications of visitation
  • “[i]n the past, removal was commonly denied because of the potential loss of jurisdiction over custody issues”
  • party opposing motion to remove must establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the move is not in the best interests of the child
  • relocation should not be disallowed solely to maintain the existing visitation patterns
  • removal should not be disallowed solely to maintain the existing visitation patterns

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Amdahl

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

104 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Auge v. Auge

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.