Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 12/2/1997
Geibe v. Geibe
Citations
- 571 N.W.2d 774
- 1997 Minn. App. LEXIS 1318
- 1997 WL 738497
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that the district court did not abuse its discretion in finding that a prima facie showing for modification had not been established
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Willis, Schumacher, Foley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. ShermanTennessee Supreme Court· 2008-08-15· cited 193×
- T.B. v. L.R.M.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-12-28· cited 157×
- Rohmiller v. HartSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2012-02-29· cited 70×
- Tank v. TankNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2004-01-20· cited 43×
- Mock v. MockNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2004-01-20· cited 27×
- Marriage of Tarlan v. SorensenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2005-09-06· cited 15×
- Marriage of Boland v. MurthaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2011-06-06· cited 15×
- In Re WeberCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2002-12-10· cited 14×
- Marriage of Matson v. MatsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2002-01-29· cited 14×
- In re the Welfare of the Children of L.L.P.Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2013-08-19· cited 14×
- Griese v. KampCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2003-07-29· cited 9×
- Barry v. St. Anthony-New Brighton Independent School District 282Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2010-04-20· cited 4×
- Marriage of Anh Phuong Le v. HolterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2013-11-04· cited 4×
- Marriage of Goldman v. GreenwoodCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2007-01-02· cited 3×
- In re the Marriage of: Denise Louise Spanier v. Terence Urban SpanierCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2014-08-18· cited 3×
- Myers v. HaskinsCourt of Appeals of Nevada· 2022-06-30· cited 2×
- Lewis-Miller v. RossCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2005-07-12· cited 1×
- Dalbec v. W.P.W.Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2002-12-10· cited 1×
- State of Tennessee v. Danita Lanette Wilson and Tiffany Nicole NormanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 2011-12-19
- Tb v. LrmSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-12-28
Cites
27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Marriage of Nice-Petersen v. Nice-PetersenSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1981-09-25· cited 98×
- London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1954-05-21· cited 42×
- Ex Parte LipscombSupreme Court of Alabama· 1994-08-26· cited 38×
- Cavanaugh v. DeBaudiniereNebraska Court of Appeals· 1992-06-23· cited 31×
- Marriage of Taflin v. TaflinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1985-04-16· cited 27×
- Roehrdanz v. RoehrdanzCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1989-04-25· cited 24×
- Gauthier v. WalterSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1910-02-04· cited 24×
- Lundman v. McKownCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1995-04-04· cited 23×
- Marriage of Ross v. RossCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1991-11-26· cited 23×
- Valentine v. LutzSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1994-03-11· cited 22×
- Matter of Marriage of FarrellCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1992-09-03· cited 19×
- Drawbaugh v. DrawbaughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-09-02· cited 18×
- Marriage of Krogstad v. KrogstadCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1986-05-27· cited 14×
- Kulla v. McNultyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1991-06-18· cited 14×
- Marriage of Lilleboe v. LilleboeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1990-04-03· cited 12×
- Marriage of Simmons v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1992-06-02· cited 12×
- Montell v. Department of Social & Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1990-05-15· cited 11×
- Marriage of Smith v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1993-11-16· cited 11×
- Marriage of Abbott v. AbbottCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1992-03-10· cited 10×
- Marriage of Harkema v. HarkemaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1991-08-20· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.