Skip to main content
Fourth Circuit· 8/10/2022

Marc Hall v. United States

Citations

  • 44 F.4th 218

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “the district court must determine whether these allegations are supported by the record and whether they rise to the level of imminent danger”
  • holding that “the district court must determine whether these allegations are supported by the record and whether they rise to the level of imminent danger”
  • holding that “the district court must determine whether these allegations are supported by the record and whether they rise to the level of imminent danger”
  • holding that “the district court must determine whether these allegations are supported by the record and whether they rise to the level of imminent danger”
  • explaining that § 1915(g) “requires that litigants allege sufficient facts to demonstrate a nexus between the claims presented and the imminent danger alleged”
  • noting that “past allegations of danger or threats of harm on their own are insufficient to satisfy the [imminent danger] exception.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

54 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.