Fourth Circuit· 8/10/2022
Marc Hall v. United States
Citations
- 44 F.4th 218
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “the district court must determine whether these allegations are supported by the record and whether they rise to the level of imminent danger”
- holding that “the district court must determine whether these allegations are supported by the record and whether they rise to the level of imminent danger”
- holding that “the district court must determine whether these allegations are supported by the record and whether they rise to the level of imminent danger”
- holding that “the district court must determine whether these allegations are supported by the record and whether they rise to the level of imminent danger”
- explaining that § 1915(g) “requires that litigants allege sufficient facts to demonstrate a nexus between the claims presented and the imminent danger alleged”
- noting that “past allegations of danger or threats of harm on their own are insufficient to satisfy the [imminent danger] exception.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Julius Hodges v. Peter MeletisFourth Circuit· 2024-07-23· cited 19×
- Joel Burrell v. D. ShirleyFourth Circuit· 2025-07-01· cited 12×
- An opinion was released in case 22-5251, Michael S. Owlfeather-Gorbey v. AveryD.C. Circuit· 2024-10-18· cited 7×
- AFSCME Maryland Council 3 v. State of MarylandFourth Circuit· 2023-02-21· cited 4×
- Stone v. United States Department of State ca/ocs/ciDistrict of Columbia· 2022-09-28
- Garfield Holley v. J. CombsFourth Circuit· 2025-04-08
Cites
54 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court· 1992-06-12· cited 24,791×
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1989-05-01· cited 22,300×
- Jones v. BockSupreme Court· 2007-01-22· cited 10,443×
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court· 1992-03-09· cited 3,104×
- Andrews v. CervantesNinth Circuit· 2007-07-05· cited 2,309×
- Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court· 2004-01-26· cited 1,956×
- Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court· 1982-06-30· cited 1,579×
- Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court· 1993-06-01· cited 1,574×
- Whitman v. American Trucking Assns., Inc.Supreme Court· 2001-02-27· cited 1,439×
- Kenneth Jay Wilson v. Lewis Yaklich, United States of America, Intervenor-Appellee. Kenneth Jay Wilson v. Mary SanfordSixth Circuit· 1998-07-27· cited 1,291×
- Richard G. Lawler v. Ronald C. Marshall, Supt. Dunn, Captain McAlister Lieutenant Dunn, Officer Boehm, Officer Paul AdamsSixth Circuit· 1990-05-23· cited 1,205×
- Domino Sugar Corporation v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392 of the United Food and Commercial Workers International Union, an Unincorporated AssociationFourth Circuit· 1993-11-30· cited 988×
- King v. BurwellSupreme Court· 2015-06-25· cited 932×
- Rubin v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1981-01-21· cited 876×
- United States v. KrasSupreme Court· 1973-01-10· cited 846×
- Lomax v. Ortiz-MarquezSupreme Court· 2020-06-08· cited 805×
- Robert Bruno Ciarpaglini v. Doctor Narinder Saini, Doctor Laurens D. Young, and Phil KingstonSeventh Circuit· 2003-12-11· cited 703×
- Pavelic & LeFlore v. Marvel Entertainment Group, Div. of Cadence Industries Corp.Supreme Court· 1990-02-20· cited 665×
- White v. ColoradoTenth Circuit· 1998-10-09· cited 626×
- John Ruddin Brown v. Lisa JohnsonEleventh Circuit· 2004-10-18· cited 625×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.