Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Ninth Circuit· 7/5/2007

Andrews v. Cervantes

Citations

  • 493 F.3d 1047
  • 2007 WL 1932824

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “[p]risoners who have 5 repeatedly brought unsuccessful suits may entirely be barred from IFP status under the three 6 strikes rule”
  • holding that “it is the circumstances at the time of the filing of the complaint that matters 16 for purposes of the ‘imminent danger’ exception under § 1915(g).”
  • holding that availability of imminent-danger exception “turns on the conditions a 10 prisoner faced at the time the complaint was filed, not at some earlier or later time”
  • holding that availability of imminent-danger exception “turns on the conditions a 7 prisoner faced at the time the complaint was filed, not at some earlier or later time”
  • holding that “it is the circumstances 6 at the time of the filing of the complaint that matters for purposes of the ‘imminent danger’ 7 exception under § 1915(g).”
  • holding that “the exception applies if the 2 complaint makes a plausible allegation that the prisoner faced ‘imminent danger of serious 3 physical injury’ at the time of filing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nelson, Cowen, Berzon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Andrews v. Cervantes

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.