Tenth Circuit· 10/9/1998

White v. Colorado

Citations

157 F.3d 1226
1998 Colo. J. C.A.R. 5280
1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 24933

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that ifp status is not a fundamental right and that §1915(g) is rationally related to the legitimate end of deterring frivolous lawsuits
concluding that plaintiff “failed to raise a credible allegation that he is in imminent danger of serious physical harm” where plaintiff did not specify “even the general nature of his ‘serious physical injury’ ”
concluding that plaintiff “failed to raise a credible allegation that he is in imminent danger of serious physical harm” where plaintiff did not specify “even the general nature of his ‘serious physical injury’ ”
finding that vague and conclusory assertions regarding withheld medical treatment were insufficient to satisfy the imminent danger standard
clarifying that “vague and utterly conclusory assertions” are insufficient but “credible, uncontroverted allegations of physical threats and attacks” are sufficient
stating that “vague and utterly conclusory assertions” of harm are insufficient to establish 8 imminent danger of serious physical harm under § 1915(g)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

47 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named White v. Colorado

8 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.