White v. Colorado

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that ifp status is not a fundamental right and that §1915(g) is rationally related to the legitimate end of deterring frivolous lawsuits
• concluding that plaintiff “failed to raise a credible allegation that he is in imminent danger of serious physical harm” where plaintiff did not specify “even the general nature of his ‘serious physical injury’ ”
• concluding that plaintiff “failed to raise a credible allegation that he is in imminent danger of serious physical harm” where plaintiff did not specify “even the general nature of his ‘serious physical injury’ ”
• finding that vague and conclusory assertions regarding withheld medical treatment were insufficient to satisfy the imminent danger standard
• clarifying that “vague and utterly conclusory assertions” are insufficient but “credible, uncontroverted allegations of physical threats and attacks” are sufficient
• stating that “vague and utterly conclusory assertions” of harm are insufficient to establish 8 imminent danger of serious physical harm under § 1915(g)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).