Robert Bruno Ciarpaglini v. Doctor Narinder Saini, Doctor Laurens D. Young, and Phil Kingston

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that it is improper to adopt a “complicated set of rules [to discern] what conditions are serious enough” to constitute “serious physical injury”
• holding that to meet the “imminent danger” requirement the “threat or prison condition [must be] real and proximate.”
• holding that to meet the “imminent danger” requirement the “threat or prison condition [must be] real and proximate.”
• recognizing that a mere disagreement with medical professionals about the appropriate treatment does not amount to an Eighth Amendment violation
• holding that plaintiff “has simply pled himself out of court by saying too much”
• holding that plaintiff “has simply pled himself out of court by saying too much”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).