Ninth Circuit· 6/26/1996

Marbled Murrelet v. Babbitt

Citations

83 F.3d 1060

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that allowing appellant to challenge on appeal the reliability of adversary’s scientific expert report which it did not challenge at trial would give it an unfair advantage
denying motion to file amicus brief because the “motion was filed late and there was no attempt to show good cause for the late filing”
rejecting footnote 2 of Sweet Home as dictum and holding that “harm” regulation prevents “a finding of harm from habitat modification alone,” without actual harm to a protected species
“As a general rule, we will not consider an issue raised for the first time on appeal.”
“Maui County does not admit or concede that streetlights in particular have [done so] . . . .”
“By failing to object to evidence at trial and request a ruling on such an objection, a party waives the right to raise admissibility issues on appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

44 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Marbled Murrelet v. Babbitt

6 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.