Loggerhead Turtle v. Volusia County Council

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that county's authorization of beach access to vehicles, which disrupted the habitat of endangered species, resulted in a taking in violation of the ESA
• holding that, if defendants violated substantive or procedural provision of ESA, a court does not have traditional equitable discretion, instead \any threatened harm is per se irreparable harm and ... public interest always favors the imposition of an injunction\
• holding that, if defendants violated substantive or procedural provision of ESA, a court does not have traditional equitable discretion, instead \any threatened harm is per se irreparable harm and ... public interest always favors the imposition of an injunction\
• holding that, if defendants violated substantive or procedural provision of ESA, a court does not have traditional equitable discretion, instead \any threatened harm is per se irreparable harm and . . . public interest always favors the imposition of an injunction\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).