Skip to main content
· 3/24/1995

Forest Conservation Council v. Rosboro Lumber Company

Citations

  • 50 F.3d 781
  • 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2175
  • 25 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20706
  • 95 Daily Journal DAR 3759
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 5974
  • 1995 WL 124609

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the citizen suit provision authorizes injunctive relief
  • “a showing of a future injury to an endangered or threatened species is actionable under the ESA.”
  • ESA claim of future harm may proceed because plaintiff proffered 7 sufficient evidence to show that defendant’s conduct “is reasonably certain to harm the 8 [endangered species] and that such harm is imminent”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pregerson, Trott, Fitzgerald

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.