· 3/24/1995
Forest Conservation Council v. Rosboro Lumber Company
Citations
- 50 F.3d 781
- 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2175
- 25 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20706
- 95 Daily Journal DAR 3759
- 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 5974
- 1995 WL 124609
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the citizen suit provision authorizes injunctive relief
- “a showing of a future injury to an endangered or threatened species is actionable under the ESA.”
- ESA claim of future harm may proceed because plaintiff proffered 7 sufficient evidence to show that defendant’s conduct “is reasonably certain to harm the 8 [endangered species] and that such harm is imminent”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pregerson, Trott, Fitzgerald
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.