Skip to main content
Ninth Circuit· 5/7/1996

Marbled Murrelet v. Babbitt

Citations

  • 83 F.3d 1068
  • 26 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20992
  • 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3208
  • 96 Daily Journal DAR 5295
  • 42 ERC (BNA) 1667
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 10420

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • making the obvious observation that “[i]f there is any difference” between the phrases federal action and major federal action, major federal action would be “the more exclusive standard”
  • “there is no evidence that the USFWS had any power to enforce those conditions other than its authority under section 9 of the ESA, and this is not enough to trigger ‘federal action’ under section 7”
  • “there is no evidence that the USFWS had any power to enforce those conditions other than its authority under section 9 of the ESA, and this is not enough to trigger ‘federal action’ under section 7”
  • examining “the letter as a whole” for sufficiency of notice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.