Skip to main content

Malone v. State

Citations

  • 687 So. 2d 218
  • 1996 WL 637405

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the petitioner was indigent based on the balance of his prison fund in the months preceding the filing of his Rule 32 petition
  • holding that the petitioner was indigent — his prison fund had shown a balance of $15.04 on the day before he filed his Rule 32 petition, and his account had never contained more than $60.21 during the four months before he filed his petition
  • holding that the petitioner was indigent -- his prison fund had shown a balance of $15.04 on the day before he filed his Rule 32 petition, and his account had never contained more than $60.21 during the four months before he filed his petition
  • reversing denial of IFP status when prisoner showed a balance of $15.04 in his prison account on the filing date, the maximum balance in the account over the previous four months was $60.21, and the filing fee was $110
  • appeal from the summary denial of a request to proceed in forma pauperis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Long

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.