Mallory v. Mallory
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 5458
Syllabus
APPELLATE REVIEW/CIVIL – CIV.R. 60(B) — MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT: Appellant's brief lacked citations to the record and relevant legal authorities, as required by Ohio and local appellate rules, which constituted an independent basis to overrule all four of appellant's assignments of error. The trial court did not err in denying appellant's motion for relief from the judgment: the motion was made under Civ.R. 60(B)(1) and (2), which have one-year filing deadlines, and appellant filed her motion more than one year after the final judgment was entered, and appellant did not demonstrate that she was entitled to relief under Civ.R. 60(B)(5) when she failed to raise that argument below and on appeal only repeated her Civ.R. 60(B)(1) and (2) arguments.
Judges: Bergeron
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Johnson v. Abdullah (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2021-09-22· cited 666×
- Strack v. PeltonOhio Supreme Court· 1994-08-31· cited 507×
- Kay v. Marc Glassman, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court· 1996-07-03· cited 452×
- Caruso-Ciresi, Inc. v. LohmanOhio Supreme Court· 1983-05-25· cited 340×
- Olthaus v. NiesenOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-12-27· cited 16×
- Tyra v. TyraOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-07-22· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.